Two prop firm evaluations can look identical on a pricing page and behave very differently on day three. One tracks drawdown off closed profit, another off open equity. One has a consistency rule, another doesn't. A trader who fails because they didn't read the drawdown definition hasn't found a bad market, they've found a rules mismatch. Comparing firms is mostly a reading exercise, and it's worth doing before the fee leaves your account.
I'm deliberately not publishing a ranking or current fee table. Prices, targets, payout rules and automation policies change, and they can differ by product and account vintage. Use the checklist below against each firm's own published rules on the day you buy.
What an evaluation actually is
You pay a fee, trade a simulated or evaluation account under the firm's rules, and if you meet the conditions you may be offered a funded account with a profit split. Failing costs you the fee, but that doesn't make the fee a cap on total cost, since resets, data fees and repeat attempts add up. A funded account also isn't the same as live capital in every case, and a payout is never guaranteed. Read what the firm says about how funded accounts are treated.
Rules to read in every document
Your next step
Build the daily map before the session.
See how ES and NQ Key Price Levels fit the daily plan. Follow the room, practice in SIM, and review what happened around each level.
- Drawdown type. Trailing or static, and what it trails: closed balance or open equity. This determines how much room an open winner gives back.
- Where the floor stops moving. Some structures lock the floor at a level once a threshold is reached. Find the exact level.
- Daily loss limit. Whether it exists, whether it ends the day or fails the account, and how it's measured.
- Consistency or profit-concentration rules. A limit on how much one day can contribute to the total.
- Minimum trading days and what counts as a trading day.
- Contract limits and whether scaling rules apply.
- News and overnight rules by product.
- Automation policy. Whether it's allowed, and any conditions. Don't assume a firm that allowed it before still does.
- Payout rules such as minimum balances, waiting periods and caps.
- Reset and re-attempt costs and any activation fees.
Also check the product. Exchange-traded ES and NQ evaluations are not interchangeable with other products. FTMO, for example, has its own structure and instruments, so don't assume its rules transfer to a futures evaluation or the reverse.
A hypothetical drawdown calculation
Everything here is an illustrative example, not any firm's actual numbers. Suppose a $50,000 account with a $2,500 trailing drawdown that follows open equity. The floor starts at $47,500.
| Step | Equity | Floor | Cushion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | $50,000 | $47,500 | $2,500 |
| Trade runs to +$1,000 open | $51,000 | $48,500 | $2,500 |
| Trade reverses to flat | $50,000 | $48,500 | $1,500 |
The trade made nothing, yet the cushion shrank by $1,000. On ES at $50 per point, that's a 20-point round trip on one contract. On MES at $5 per point, it's the same dollars at ten contracts. That is why drawdown type matters more than the headline number. Stop orders can also slip, so a planned loss can be larger than the plan.
Compare total cost, not the sticker fee
Build a small cost table for each firm: evaluation fee, reset fee, activation fee, data and platform fees, and any monthly subscription. Then pick a pass assumption and compute expected spend. As a hypothetical, if the fee were $150 and you needed three attempts, you'd have spent $450 before any payout. Don't assume you'll pass on the first try, and don't treat a fee as the cap on your downside, because repeating attempts is the usual way costs grow.
Taxes can erase a small difference
A cheaper fee doesn't help if the tax treatment of your payouts is worse than you assumed. Payouts from a prop firm may be service or contract income and are not automatically treated as futures gains. Section 1256 treatment applies to qualifying contracts subject to eligibility, elections and exceptions; see the IRS pages on Form 6781 and Topic 429. Talk to a qualified tax professional about your situation, since trader status and deductible expenses depend on facts.
Automation and evaluation rules
If you plan to automate, read the firm's policy, then test the bot on a SIM account with the exact limits you'll face. Not every firm permits every kind of automation. Bot access is part of the Pro tier at YMI ($795/month, no trial). For how the bots behave, see the Marty bot specs and KPL bot specs instead of relying on any summary here.
A short pre-purchase routine
- Open each firm's current rules page and save the date.
- Fill in the ten items above for each.
- Run the drawdown example with your intended size.
- Total the cost for three attempts.
- Pick the firm whose rules fit your style, not the one with the lowest fee.
None of this predicts whether you'll pass. It just removes the avoidable failures that come from not knowing the rules.
About the Author
Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader
Cameron trades ES, NQ, and futures across multiple market cycles. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading and manages Magnum Opus Capital. His work emphasizes documented rules, risk controls, and review over outcome promises.
Free, No Credit Card
Get the Free Room Preview
See how the room works before choosing a membership. Follow a setup in SIM and review what happened.
Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer
Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.
Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.
CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.

