Take a session with five trades. Three were planned entries and two weren't. You net minus $25 and you close the platform irritated. Without a review, that day is just a bad day. With one, you can see that the plan trades made money and a single impulsive trade took it back, which is a specific thing you can change.
Why reviews get skipped
Losing days are unpleasant to look at again. Winning days feel like they need no checking. Both are reasons the review gets skipped, and both skip the useful part. A winning day can contain a trade that broke your rules and worked anyway, and a losing day can contain only good decisions with a bad result. You can't tell which without reading the trades against your criteria.
The 20-minute structure
Your next step
Build the daily map before the session.
See how ES and NQ Key Price Levels fit the daily plan. Follow the room, practice in SIM, and review what happened around each level.
Minutes 1 to 3: the numbers. Write down net P&L, number of trades, wins, losses, largest winner, largest loser and total commissions. Do this before reading any trade closely.
Minutes 4 to 8: annotate each trade. Mark entries and exits on a chart. For each trade, write the setup name, the reason you entered, whether the stop and target were set in advance, and the result. Then ask whether the trade met all your entry criteria or whether you talked yourself into it. If you trade fixed reference levels like KPLs, note which level and whether you traded it as planned, keeping in mind those levels are anchored to the RTH opening print and don't move during the day.
Minutes 9 to 13: look across the day. Were losses concentrated in a time window? Did you trade right after a loss? Did you chase entries? Cut winners short or hold losers past the stop? Were you in a position during a scheduled release you meant to avoid? Use the Eastern-time stamp so you can compare days.
Minutes 14 to 17: pick one change. Write one specific behavior for tomorrow, such as 'no entries after my self-set cutoff time', 'set the target in the order template before entry', or 'be flat before the 8:30am ET release'. One is easier to remember and measure than five.
Minutes 18 to 20: save the record. Save an annotated screenshot named with the date. Over weeks, the folder shows you your habits better than memory does.
A worked example (hypothetical)
| Trade | In plan? | Net result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | plus $150 |
| 2 | Yes | minus $75 |
| 3 | Yes | plus $100 |
| 4 | No | minus $75 |
| 5 | No | minus $125 |
The day nets minus $25. The three planned trades net plus $175. The two unplanned trades net minus $200. The commitment for tomorrow writes itself: any trade not already in the written plan needs a reason written first. One day isn't proof that unplanned trades always lose, so keep tagging them and see what many days show.
What to track across sessions
A single day is a small sample. Patterns show up across weeks, and the review should feed a running log you can query: which setups made money after costs, which time windows lost, what your results look like when all criteria were met versus when you deviated, how you traded after losses, and whether any weekdays stand out. Be careful with the last one. With only a few weeks of data, a weekday pattern is likely noise. Before dropping a setup or a window, wait for enough trades in that group and decide in advance what result would justify the change. Thirty trades isn't a statistically proven edge, and fifty simulated trades isn't live proof either.
Connecting the review to tomorrow
Put the commitment at the top of the next pre-session checklist so it's the first thing you read. That keeps one lesson moving from day to day instead of starting blank every morning. Check at the next review whether you followed it, not whether the day made money. A day can follow the plan and lose, or break the plan and win. You are measuring the behavior, since that's what you control.
Keeping it small enough to do
The format matters less than doing it. If twenty minutes is too much on a heavy day, shrink the review: numbers, one lesson, one commitment. A short review done every session is more useful than a detailed one done when you feel like it. Some traders like having someone else read their notes. YMI's community comes with the Intro tier if you want a place to compare notes, though the journal works just as well alone.
About the Author
Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader
Cameron trades ES, NQ, and futures across multiple market cycles. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading and manages Magnum Opus Capital. His work emphasizes documented rules, risk controls, and review over outcome promises.
Free, No Credit Card
Get the Free Room Preview
See how the room works before choosing a membership. Follow a setup in SIM and review what happened.
Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer
Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.
Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.
CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.
