After a failed evaluation, the dashboard offers two buttons and a price beside each. The cheaper one isn't automatically the better one, because a reset and a new evaluation can differ in recurring fees, minimum trading days, and consistency rules, not just the checkout total. Treating it as a pure price comparison is how traders pay twice for what looked like the same product.
What the two options generally are
A reset usually restores your existing account to its starting balance and drawdown line. A new evaluation is a fresh account, bought at the current listed price. Beyond that, firms differ, and the same firm may handle it differently depending on account type and when you bought it. I won't quote current prices or terms, because they change; the way to get them is the checklist below.
One point is easy to get wrong. A reset removes your progress. If you were $4,800 up on a $6,000 target when you failed, the balance returns to the starting number and the profit is gone. The reset buys a restart, not a rescue of what you earned.
What to compare in the rule documents
Your next step
Build the daily map before the session.
See how ES and NQ Key Price Levels fit the daily plan. Follow the room, practice in SIM, and review what happened around each level.
- Total cost today for each option, including taxes and any promotional code, with the exact checkout screen.
- Whether any recurring monthly fee restarts, continues, or stacks on top of the current one.
- Whether the drawdown type and starting level are the same after a reset, and whether the profit target and minimum trading days restart.
- Whether the account type or rule set is the same one you'd get today. Older accounts can sit under different rules than new purchases.
- Any activation or data fees charged after you pass, and whether those apply to both paths.
- Restrictions on copying trades or running multiple evaluations at once, if you plan to do so.
Take screenshots of both prices and of the rule sections you relied on. If the firm's page and support disagree, get the answer in writing before paying.
When each path tends to make sense
Buy new when it costs the same or less and the rules are identical or better. Promotions come and go, so check both prices on the same day. Reset when it's materially cheaper, or when the new-purchase rules are worse than the rules your older account is under, which only the documents can tell you.
Neither option should be bought before you've diagnosed the failure. If a single oversized trade breached the line, that's a sizing problem you can fix. If your rules had no edge to begin with, a second attempt pays the same fee for the same outcome. Write down what failed, look at the trade log, and change something specific before paying anything.
The cost per funded account
Your own history is the useful number. If you track attempts, cost per pass is total evaluation spend divided by the number of passes. This table uses hypothetical figures; real fees, pass rates, and extra charges are yours to fill in.
| Average cost per attempt | Share of attempts that pass | Expected spend per pass |
|---|---|---|
| $150 | 1 in 3 | $450 |
| $150 | 1 in 10 | $1,500 |
The formula is cost per attempt divided by the pass share, and it assumes each attempt is independent with the same chance. That's rarely true, since you learn between attempts and your method may change. It also leaves out monthly fees on passed accounts, activation fees, data costs, time, and taxes. A funded account carries no guarantee of payouts, and a funded account is not the same as live trading with your own capital. The evaluation fee does not cap your downside either, since time, fees after passing, and rule risk continue.
Before buying again, put your expected profit per month into the edge calculator alongside the cost per pass. If the numbers only work when you assume an unusually high pass rate, that's useful to know.
On running several evaluations at once
Some traders run two or three evaluations in parallel to avoid a gap if one fails. There is a catch. If all accounts use the same strategy in the same market, they tend to fail on the same bad day, so you've multiplied fees without diversifying much. Many firms also have specific rules on copy trading and on using the same method across accounts, so read those before opening more than one. Parallel accounts raise the cash you have at risk, so size it as a budget you can lose.
Keep a log
For every attempt record the date, firm, account size, price paid, reset or new, trading days used, result, and the specific reason for any failure. After five or six attempts you'll see whether failures cluster around news days, oversized positions, or one setup. That pattern tells you more than any promotion will.
About the Author
Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader
Cameron trades ES, NQ, and futures across multiple market cycles. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading and manages Magnum Opus Capital. His work emphasizes documented rules, risk controls, and review over outcome promises.
Free, No Credit Card
Get the Free Room Preview
See how the room works before choosing a membership. Follow a setup in SIM and review what happened.
Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer
Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.
Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.
CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.

