The drawdown clock is the first thing to understand about any TopStep-style evaluation, because it determines how much room your normal trading has. The rest, such as targets, splits and trial offers, is secondary and has changed more than once. This review leaves the old dollar figures out and shows you what to verify and how to run the math.
What kind of account is this
TopStep has been around since 2012, which gives it a longer public history than most competitors, but a long history doesn't tell you that today's rules suit you. Evaluation accounts in this industry trade in a simulated environment that mirrors CME markets, and payouts come from the firm's business according to its contract. What a funded stage is, and whether it is simulated or connected to live markets, depends on the program and can change. Don't assume funded means live trading, and don't assume a payout is guaranteed.
The structure to look up
Your next step
Build the daily map before the session.
See how ES and NQ Key Price Levels fit the daily plan. Follow the room, practice in SIM, and review what happened around each level.
Older descriptions of TopStep's path used a Trading Combine, then a further qualification stage in some programs, then a funded account. Newer offers may have fewer steps. For the account you're considering, find these in the firm's current documents:
- Number of stages and the profit target for each.
- Whether a minimum number of trading days applies.
- The maximum loss limit, how it is calculated and when.
- Any daily loss limit.
- Consistency rules, if any, at the evaluation and funded stages.
- Payout eligibility: days, minimum profit, minimum request, and processing method and time.
- Fees: evaluation, reset, data and any monthly charge after funding.
Intraday versus end-of-day drawdown
The detail that changes behavior most is whether the loss limit is measured against intraday equity or only against the closing balance. Take a hypothetical $50,000 account with a $2,000 limit measured from the highest end-of-day balance, so the floor is $48,000. If the firm monitors equity continuously and you touch $48,000 intraday, you are in violation even if you would have closed at $49,500. A firm that checks only at the close wouldn't flag it.
For sizing, divide the limit by the dollar value of a point and your contract count. On ES at $50 per point, a $2,000 limit is 40 points on one contract and about 13.3 points on three contracts ($2,000 / $150). Add the open profit you may hold: if the floor trails intraday highs, a winning position that gives back gains can breach the limit without the account ever closing lower than where it started. Stop orders can also slip in fast markets, so your actual loss can exceed the planned one.
The practical test: if you often hold trades through large swings against you before they work, a continuous check is much harder. If you use tight stops and exit quickly, the difference narrows.
Payout splits, with a hypothetical
Earlier drafts of this review described a schedule that paid the trader 100% of an initial block of profit and a lower share after. Whether that still applies, and on which accounts, is something to confirm. The math works on any version. Suppose, hypothetically, a firm pays 100% of the first $10,000 and 90% thereafter, and another pays a flat 90%.
| Total payouts | Tiered split | Flat 90% | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $10,000 | $9,000 | $1,000 |
| $20,000 | $19,000 | $18,000 | $1,000 |
The benefit is a fixed $1,000, so it matters most to a trader who is small and just getting started. It's worth weighing against a harder drawdown, because a better split is of no use if the account doesn't survive to be paid. Also check whether a split applies per account or across your whole history with the firm.
Comparing TopStep with Apex
Use the same checklist on both and fill in the blanks from their current documents.
- Stages: a longer path gives more time to show consistency but more time exposed to the rules. A shorter path is faster only if you can meet the target and the day count.
- Drawdown measurement: intraday monitoring and end-of-day monitoring suit different styles, as shown above.
- Consistency: check if either firm limits one day's share of profit, at which stage, and how it's calculated.
- Split and payout conditions: compare after counting fees and eligibility days.
- Multiple accounts and automation: policies differ. Apex prohibits automated trading and algorithm usage. The TopstepX API policy allows SIM access from a personal device, excludes Live accounts and prohibits VPS, VPN or remote-server order transmission. Neither a platform connection nor a bot subscription establishes permission or compatibility.
- Trials: if a free trial exists, find out what it includes before you rely on it as a test of the platform.
Apex's own rules are covered in the Apex rules guide on this site, which uses the same checklist.
How to decide
Don't choose by reputation. Take the last 30 or more of your own trades, or a simulated set, and replay your equity curve against each firm's drawdown rule. Count how often the floor would have been breached and how much room you had at the lowest point. Remember that 30 trades is not a statistically proven edge and that simulated fills don't confirm real slippage or the pressure of a live account. Then estimate the expected evaluation cost as fee divided by an honest pass probability. The edge calculator can organize the numbers. If both firms look workable, pick the one whose rules you can follow without changing how you trade.
About the Author
Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader
Cameron trades ES, NQ, and futures across multiple market cycles. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading and manages Magnum Opus Capital. His work emphasizes documented rules, risk controls, and review over outcome promises.
Free, No Credit Card
Get the Free Room Preview
See how the room works before choosing a membership. Follow a setup in SIM and review what happened.
Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer
Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.
Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.
CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.



