Strategy

Pairs Trading Strategy: How Hedge Funds Use Correlated Assets to Reduce Market Risk

Cameron Bennion
·
2026-08-23
·
8 min read

While analyzing a company called DXCM (Dexcom, a continuous glucose monitor manufacturer), Cameron proposed a pairs trade framework to the Magnum Opus Capital investment team: "This could also be looked at as a pairs trade. We could simultaneously short DXCM while longing another company like Abbott who manufactures the Libre CGM. It adds a bit more beta but if consumers stop using DXCM, they have to use another product and Abbott would likely absorb some of those customers."

That single message captures the core logic of pairs trading: instead of making a pure directional bet on one company, you identify a relationship between two correlated assets, then take opposing positions to profit from the relationship changing while partially hedging directional market risk.

What Is Pairs Trading?

Pairs trading is a market-neutral strategy that involves taking a long position in one asset while simultaneously taking a short position in a correlated asset. The profit comes not from the direction of the market but from the spread between the two positions moving in the anticipated direction.

The classic form: if two stocks in the same sector typically trade at a stable price ratio, and the ratio deviates significantly, you buy the underperforming stock and short the outperforming stock, expecting the ratio to revert to its historical mean.

The strategy is called "market neutral" because the long and short positions partially offset each other's exposure to broad market moves. If the S&P 500 drops 2%, both positions typically lose — but the loss on the long is partially offset by the gain on the short. The net exposure is to the spread between the two assets, not to the market direction.

Real Example: The ITA/XAR Defense ETF Trade

Trade This Systematically

Stop reading. Start executing.

Join 500+ traders using YMI's automated bots, daily KPLs, and AI trade plans — no guesswork required.

Magnum Opus ran an ITA/XAR pairs trade based on a structural analysis: the ITA ETF (iShares U.S. Aerospace and Defense) had position sizing within the ETF that was misallocated relative to the actual business composition of defense contractors vs. commercial aerospace manufacturers. XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace and Defense) had a different weighting methodology.

The thesis: the allocation difference between the two ETFs would eventually normalize as both ETFs were rebalanced and investor capital flowed toward more accurately-weighted defense exposure. The trade: long the underweighted ETF, short the overweighted one — capturing the spread as rebalancing occurred, with minimal directional market exposure because both ETFs move generally together with the defense sector.

This is institutional-level thinking: not "defense is going up" (directional bet) but "these two correlated instruments are mispriced relative to each other" (relative value bet).

The DXCM/Abbott Logic

The DXCM/Abbott pairs trade Cameron described follows the same relative value framework but with a competitive displacement thesis: if Dexcom's continuous glucose monitor market share was being eroded by Abbott's FreeStyle Libre technology, then:

  • DXCM's revenue and earnings would underperform
  • Abbott's CGM division would gain market share and outperform
  • The spread between DXCM and ABT stock performance would widen in Abbott's favor

The pairs trade: short DXCM (expected to underperform), long ABT or a healthcare ETF weighted toward Abbott (expected to absorb departing DXCM customers). The net position hedges against broad healthcare sector moves while expressing the specific competitive displacement thesis.

The "adds a bit more beta" comment Cameron noted is accurate: this pairs trade isn't purely market-neutral because DXCM and ABT have different market caps, different sector exposures, and different sensitivities to broader market moves. True market neutrality requires precise dollar-weighting and often beta-weighting to equalize directional exposure.

How Pairs Trading Applies to Futures Markets

Pairs trading translates directly to futures markets in several forms:

ES vs NQ spread trading
ES (S&P 500 futures) and NQ (Nasdaq-100 futures) are highly correlated but have different sector compositions — NQ has higher technology weighting, ES has more financial and industrial exposure. When tech sentiment diverges from broad market sentiment, the ES/NQ spread moves. Trading the spread (long NQ, short ES when tech is expected to outperform; or the reverse) is a form of pairs trading applied to equity index futures.

Correlated commodity pairs
Natural gas and crude oil are correlated energy commodities with spread relationships that can be traded. Gold and silver have long been traded as a pairs strategy (the gold/silver ratio is one of the most-tracked spread metrics in commodities). These pairs have historically mean-reverting spread properties that create statistical edge over large samples.

Calendar spreads (same contract, different expiry)
ES June vs. ES September futures trade at a premium/discount relationship determined by the cost of carry. When this spread deviates from fair value, it creates a pairs opportunity within the same instrument.

The Risk Framework for Pairs Trades

Pairs trading reduces directional market risk but introduces two new risk categories:

Basis risk: The assumption that two correlated assets will continue to move together can fail. DXCM and ABT could both rise for company-specific reasons unrelated to their competitive relationship, making the short DXCM leg a source of unexpected loss. Competitive displacement theses can take much longer to play out than anticipated or not play out at all.

Leverage risk: Running both a long and a short requires more capital and margin than either position alone. The pairs trade isn't "half as risky" — it has different risk characteristics, not lower risk absolutely.

The professional management at Magnum Opus involves explicit exit planning for every pairs position — Cameron's note about the ITA/XAR trade: "I need you to establish an exit plan for this." Exit criteria are defined before entry, not improvised when the trade moves against you.

Learn the full systematic framework. YMI Pro Trader includes Cameron's complete toolkit — from KPL-based day trading to the multi-strategy approach that runs parallel systems in different market environments.

Tags:

About the Author

Cameron Bennion

Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader

Cameron has 18+ years of live market experience trading ES, NQ, and futures. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading to everyday traders — the same quantitative methods used at his hedge fund, Magnum Opus Capital. His members have collectively earned $50M+ in prop firm funded accounts.

18+ Years Trading ExperienceHedge Fund Manager — Magnum Opus Capital$50M+ Funded for MembersNinjaTrader SpecialistFutures: ES · NQ · RTY · CL · GC
Trade with Cameron's systems:7-Day Free Trial →

Free — No Credit Card

Get Daily KPLs in Your Inbox

AI-generated Key Price Levels for ES & NQ, delivered every trading morning. Join 500+ traders who start their session with a plan.

🔒 Your information is secure. We respect your privacy and will never spam you.

Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer

Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.

Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.

CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.

Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.

Ready to Apply These Strategies?

Join 500+ traders using YMI's automated bots, daily KPLs, and AI trade plans to trade systematically.

Intro Trader includes a 7-day free trial • 30-day money-back guarantee on all tiers