The classic RSI mistake is buying every reading below 30 and selling every reading above 70. In a range that can look fine. In a strong trend, RSI can sit in one zone for a long stretch while price keeps going, and each entry just adds to a losing position.
What RSI calculates
J. Welles Wilder introduced RSI in 1978. It compares recent average gains to recent average losses over a lookback, usually 14 bars, and scales the result from 0 to 100. The formula is RSI = 100 - (100 / (1 + RS)), where RS is the average gain divided by the average loss.
A quick hypothetical: over 14 bars, suppose the average up-close is 2.0 points and the average down-close is 1.0 point. RS is 2.0, so RSI is 100 - (100 / 3) = 66.7. If the average gain and loss were equal, RS is 1 and RSI is 50. Wilder's version uses a smoothed average, so your platform's number may differ slightly from a simple average calculation.
Notice what that tells you. RSI describes how lopsided recent price changes were. It says nothing about whether the market is cheap, expensive, or about to turn.
Why oversold in a downtrend is not a buy
Your next step
Build the daily map before the session.
See how ES and NQ Key Price Levels fit the daily plan. Follow the room, practice in SIM, and review what happened around each level.
If sellers dominate bar after bar, the average loss stays larger than the average gain and RSI stays low. A reading of 28 in that situation confirms the sellers are active. It doesn't prove they're tired. The same logic works in reverse for overbought readings in an uptrend.
RSI as a regime filter
A more useful job for RSI is classifying what kind of market you're in, then choosing how to read everything else. These zones are common practitioner heuristics, not proven rules, so treat them as starting points to test:
- RSI mostly holding above 40 and reaching 70 or higher on rallies suggests an uptrend regime. Pullbacks toward the 40 to 50 area are the ones to study, and shorts need extra justification.
- RSI mostly holding below 60 and hitting 30 or lower on drops suggests a downtrend regime. Bounces toward 50 to 60 are the area to study, and longs need extra justification.
- RSI swinging back and forth through 50 between roughly 30 and 70 suggests a range. Overbought and oversold readings are more relevant there.
None of these zones guarantees an outcome. You are using them to decide which kind of setup to look for, nothing more.
Divergence is a flag, not a signal
Bearish divergence means price makes a higher high while RSI makes a lower high. Bullish divergence means price makes a lower low while RSI makes a higher low. Both say the latest push came with less momentum than the previous one.
Momentum can fade for a long time before price turns, and sometimes it never does. I treat divergence as a reason to pay attention and wait for price itself to confirm, such as a break of the last swing in the opposite direction. Without that confirmation you're guessing, and divergence in a strong trend can stack up several times before the trend ends.
Settings: test, don't copy
The default is 14. Shorter periods such as 7 or 9 react faster and produce more noise. Longer periods such as 21 smooth the line and lag. There is no setting that is correct for every market or timeframe, so pick one and define the test:
- Choose one instrument (say ES) and one timeframe.
- Write down the rule before you look at results, for example: long only when RSI(14) holds above 40 on a pullback and price reclaims the prior swing high.
- Record every instance in a spreadsheet with entry, stop, exit and result in R multiples, including costs and slippage.
- Change only one setting at a time, and keep the old results so you can see whether a tweak helped or just reshuffled noise.
- Hold some data back. If you tune on one period and the rule only works there, you've fitted the past.
A few dozen trades won't prove an edge. They'll show you whether the rule is even workable to execute.
Combining RSI with fixed daily levels
Here is a hypothetical to show the idea. Suppose ES is trading near a reference level at 5,780 and the 5-minute RSI(14) reads 32 with bullish divergence. That is two conditions pointing the same direction. It is not a prediction. Your plan still needs a defined stop, a target and a size. Ten points of risk on one ES contract is $500, and on one MES contract it's $50.
YMI's KPL are fixed reference prices anchored to the regular-session opening print at 9:30 am ET, so the standard map can't be finished before the open and doesn't move intraday. They're a separate thing from RSI, and the model context that comes with higher tiers is separate again. How the levels are built is explained in KPL trading.
If you'd like the course and the daily ES/NQ levels to practice this alongside, the Intro plan is $97 per month after a 7-day trial.
About the Author
Founder, Young Money Investments · Quant Trader
Cameron trades ES, NQ, and futures across multiple market cycles. He founded Young Money Investments to teach systematic, data-driven trading and manages Magnum Opus Capital. His work emphasizes documented rules, risk controls, and review over outcome promises.
Free, No Credit Card
Get the Free Room Preview
See how the room works before choosing a membership. Follow a setup in SIM and review what happened.
Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer
Educational Purposes Only: The content provided in this blog is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Young Money Investments is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst.
Risk Warning: Trading futures, forex, stocks, and cryptocurrencies involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The valuation of futures, stocks, and options may fluctuate, and as a result, clients may lose more than their original investment.
CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical or Simulated Performance Results: Certain results (including backtests mentioned in these articles) are hypothetical. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
Testimonials: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.



